Stop Managing Two Compliance Registers: How to Run AML/CTF + AFSL Australia 2026 as One Program
If you hold an AFS licence and you're now also a full AML/CTF reporting entity, you've quietly become a dual-regime business — answerable to ASIC under the Corporations Act and to AUSTRAC under the AML/CTF Act. And unless you've deliberately designed against it, you're almost certainly doing the same work twice.
The overlap nobody planned for
ASIC and AUSTRAC are different regulators with different Acts, but the operational obligations rhyme. Look at how much sits in both columns:
- Breach and incident reporting — ASIC's reportable situations / breach reporting regime under the Corporations Act (Chapter 7) and AUSTRAC reporting obligations, including suspicious matter reports (s 41).
- Training records — who was trained, on what, when, evidenced.
- Board and management reporting — governance oversight. Under the reformed AML/CTF Act, your governing body carries explicit oversight duties for ML/TF risk.
- Audit and review — the AML/CTF independent evaluation (s 26F(4)(f)) and your AFSL compliance review cycles.
- Record keeping — overlapping retention obligations (AML/CTF records are kept seven years under Part 10), different homes.
Most firms manage these in parallel: an ASIC compliance register and process over here, an AML/CTF register and process over there. Same training event logged twice. Same incident assessed against two frameworks in two places. Two sets of evidence to assemble at audit time. It's duplicated effort, and duplicated effort is where things fall out of sync — which is exactly when one regulator finds a gap the other column would have caught.
Why integration beats duplication
One platform built for both regulators
Veriqua is the only platform built for dual AFSL + AML compliance — one register, one dashboard, one audit trail covering both regulators. Most AML tools assume you're only doing AML. Most AFSL compliance tools ignore AUSTRAC entirely. Veriqua was built by an AFS licensee, for the reality of carrying both obligations at once — so your breach reporting, training, governance and review evidence live in one place, mapped to both the Corporations Act Chapter 7 world and the AML/CTF world.
For a firm currently reconciling two registers by hand, that's not a marginal saving — it's the end of doing compliance twice. See the dual-regime dashboard in two minutes, no login: demo.veriqua.com.au/start.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the overlap between ASIC and AUSTRAC obligations for AFS licensees?↓
Do AFS licensees need to lodge suspicious matter reports (SMRs) with AUSTRAC?↓
How long must AML/CTF records be kept for AFS licensees?↓
What is a reportable situation under ASIC's breach reporting regime and how does it interact with AML/CTF?↓
Related articles
What Tranche 2 AML/CTF Changes for Your AFSL Business
The new ML/TF risk assessment, AML/CTF policies and what the 31 March 2026 transition means for existing licensees.
The AML/CTF Independent Evaluation Every AFSL Firm Must Plan For
What changed from the old independent review, how often it's required and what the evaluator must cover.
TCSP AML/CTF Reporting Entity Scope Australia 2026
If your AFSL firm also forms companies or manages trusts, these are separately captured obligations.
See how Veriqua handles this
Veriqua is an Australian compliance operating system for AFSL holders and AUSTRAC reporting entities — automating AML/CTF programs, customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, SMR lodgement and board reporting.
Disclaimer: This article is general information only and is current as at June 2026. It reflects our understanding of obligations under the AML/CTF Act and the Corporations Act and AUSTRAC and ASIC guidance as at that date, all of which may change. It is not legal, financial or compliance advice. AFS licensees should obtain advice from a qualified professional and refer to current AUSTRAC and ASIC guidance at austrac.gov.au and asic.gov.au before acting.